Archbishop Wilton D. Gregory, of Atlanta, puts out this statement:
I have decided not to be present at the St. Thomas More Society’s Awards Luncheon following the Red Mass because the organziation has independently selected 3 attorneys to honor, one of whom is former Governor Roy Barnes. While I recognize and applaud Governor Barnes’ efforts surrounding the controversy of the Georgia state flag, his support of abortion is contrary to the church’s teaching. The Catholic Church proclaims that human life is sacred and that the dignity of the human person is the very foundation of a moral vision for society.
Background: STM Society is an independent society of Catholic lawyers, but in their annual luncheon and Red Mass they welcome attorneys of all faiths (or lacks thereof) and thus they honor jurists for various acts. Former Gov. Barnes is being honored for getting the Georgia flag changed, and also for dedicating much of his service as a lawyer to the poor since he left office. But when he ran for governor in 1998, he was loudly pro-abortion. He’s not Catholic, so he is not bound by the Church’s teaching on the subject. But, in the Catholic community in Atlanta there’s been an outcry that a Catholic organization shouldn’t be honoring anyone who’s pro-abortion, especially vocally and publicly so. STM Society operates independently of the diocese, so the Bishop can’t keep them from giving Barnes an award. But, he is making a statement by not going to the awards luncheon.
In the Georgia Bulletin I got in the mail yesterday, there’s the statement above as well as an accompanying story on the subject. As of this writing, the Georgia Bulletin’s website hasn’t been updated, so I can’t link you to the article, but I will transcribe parts of it here:
“We appreciate Archbishop Gregory’s celebrating the Red Mass and his friendship to our Society. We will miss him at the luncheon, and it is an unfortunate turn of events that will cause his absences,” [Michael Sullivan, immediate past president of the society] said in a written statement.
The Church is losing an opportunity to build bridges in an ecumenical spirit because of a “small but loud minority,” he said. “the vast majority of catholics, not to mention our non-Catholic guests-applaud the specific good actions for which we are recognizing these three honorees,” Sullivan said.
Ahh, there we go. Insult the Bishop and state that he would never reasonably make the decision not to attend based on his principles, but rather based on a small but loud minority. Never mind that it could scandalize the Church and Her members for the Bishop to be present where a publicly pro-abort politician is honored.
Andrew Nelson, staff writer for the Bulletin, includes much superfluous information from people and semi-Catholic colleges in his article. Examples:
Jesuit Father Thomas Reese, a political scientist of the Woodstock Theological Center at Georgetown University, said the Atlanta lawyer group faces the same dilemma as Catholic colleges. In fact, he thinks Catholic groups could avoid the disputes by not ranting honors to elected officials altogether. [I could agree with this one]
Critics may “falsely assume” a church group is applauding a politician’s entire career, instead of one specific act, he said.
“They might want to honor someone for their work with the poor, of with heath care, or immigrants,” he said. “…Does he have to be perfect on every position the Church has?” [poor, health care, immigrants? reads like a list of leftist talking points. coincidence?]
Kudos to the Archbishop for doing the politically incorrect thing! I’ll get links up to the actual articles if/when they are posted to the Bulletin’s website.
UPDATE: The full text of the article cited here can now be found here.
I’ve also posted links to the original article and all the follow up letters to the editor here.